<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Canderel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thechocolatereview.net/category/company/canderel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thechocolatereview.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canderel Rich Dark Chocolate</title>
		<link>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/09/canderel-rich-dark-chocolate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canderel-rich-dark-chocolate</link>
		<comments>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/09/canderel-rich-dark-chocolate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 10:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canderel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspartame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canderel Rich Dark Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocoa solids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maltitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweeteners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechocolatereview.net/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I was disappointed with Canderel&#8217;s milk chocolate bar, citing a lack of real, distinct flavour and kick to their bar as my reasoning. So I come to this bar with low expectations, and it&#8217;s up to them to surprise me, or prove me right. Obviously once again this has no added sugar, what&#8217;s different [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/09/canderel-rich-dark-chocolate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canderel Silky Milk Chocolate</title>
		<link>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/06/canderel-silky-milk-chocolate/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canderel-silky-milk-chocolate</link>
		<comments>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/06/canderel-silky-milk-chocolate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canderel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aspartame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canderel Silky Milk Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cavalier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high wycombe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maltitol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milk Chocolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweetener]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thechocolatereview.net/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canderel are known for their sugar-substitute sweeteners, but awhile ago they branched out into chocolate manufacturing with two bars, a milk chocolate bar and a dark chocolate bar. Simple enough, right? I&#8217;ve always had a soft spot for them as a company for the simple reason that their headquarters are in my hometown (hopefully at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thechocolatereview.net/2008/06/06/canderel-silky-milk-chocolate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

